Free Newsletter
What's next for CDNs?
All the predictions I've seen lately have broadband access rapidly increasing under an Obama administration. Everyone is also almost universally pronouncing that online video will drive major increases in traffic and bandwidth usage over the next few years.
That's made me take a close look at the players in the space that will handle the explosion of traffic, enable larger audiences to watch longer live streaming events, and deliver a company's video assets globally. Of course, I'm talking about content delivery networks.
Currently, Akamai is the leader in the space, followed by Limelight and Level 3. Akamai has generated more than a quarter billion dollars in cash flow since the beginning of the year, and it has nearly $800 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand. However, the company just announced it was cutting 110 jobs, so there are questions as to how the economic downturn is affecting the CDN space.
Limelight, which operates at large losses and lost an expensive patent infringement case to Akamai, has narrowed its negative margins but still looks wounded. At press time, Limelight's stock was trading at around $2.50, a far cry from its $24 IPO price.
Level 3 is in slightly better position, as its CDN business has been growing and offsetting losses elsewhere in its holdings. It acquired Savvis's CDN properties in Asia, completely retooled them, and now has a significant, top-class offering in that growing space.
But the Big 3 CDNs are sure to start feeling pressure from upstarts in the space.
James Segil, president of EdgeCast, said his company is the fastest growing CDN in the industry, and that it has added 325 customers since it exited stealth mode about 16 months ago. He noted that EdgeCast had managed to gain a significant foothold in the market due to the fact that it is taller, better looking and more charming than the other major CDNs. Those attributes are a big plus in Los Angeles, where EdgeCast is based, but Segil, this time on a serious note, said the position near Hollywood is a unique opportunity for his company to work with the major studios on their growing content delivery efforts.
Segil said the lack of legacy dead weight allows EdgeCast to offer full CDN services at half the price of other full-service players -- he criticized Limelight for the costly buildout of its fiber network. Segil and his original team built the technology behind EdgeCast themselves without outside funding. The company then got a $6 million round of funding from Disney's Steamboat Ventures shortly after announcing itself to the public in 3Q 2007. Sales are now 75 percent direct and 25 percent indirect, through resellers and companies that bundle EdgeCast's CDN offering with other telecommunications and bandwidth needs, according to Segil. EdgeCast leases fiber capacity from incumbent telcos, which Segil said is a much more cost-effective way to deliver content, because there is a glut of dark fiber buildout.
He doesn't think cloud offerings from Amazon and others pose a true threat to top level CDN players, either, because they can't support the level of traffic and video formats, for instance, that the big CDNs can. While he feels smaller companies will benefit greatly from low-cost, use-as-you-need cloud content delivery offerings, he thinks anyone concerned with low cost, high quality, large-scale delivery will inevitably turn to a major CDN.
It should be a very interesting space to watch and consider, as so many aspects of the online video industry depend on quality delivery of content.
- Pete
Comments
Hi Pete, couple of clarifications on your post.
You say, "Akamai is the leader in the space, followed by Limelight and Level 3" but not sure what metrics you are basing that on? If it is on total 2008 revenue, it would be Akamai, Limelight and CDNetworks.
You also say, "Limelight, which operates at large losses and lost an expensive patent infringement case to Akamai, has narrowed its negative margins but still looks wounded." But Limelight has yet to pay any damages to Akamai since the case is still in court, so we don't know if/when it will be expensive to Limelight. Also, last quarter, Limelight not only beat estimates but also increased their margins and continues to sign up big customers. So not sure how you are defining "wounded"? If you are basing it on Limelight's stock price, yes, it looks bad, but keep in mind that last week Akamai's stock hit a 52 week low.
You mention Level 3's purchase of "Savvis's CDN properties in Asia", but Level 3 acquired all of SAVVIS's CDN assets, none of which were in Asia. Level 3 only recently added a CDN footprint in Asia, but nothing to do with the SAVVIS assets.
Thanks
--Dan
Clarification: I based the "leaders" assertion on a more holistic look at all happenings and actions by the companies. CDNetworks certainly is third in revenues; sorry for any confusion. I'll have to circle back with the Level 3 people about the SAVVIS acquisition's specifics. I spoke with a representative who told me explicitly that they used exisiting SAVVIS assets in Asia. I'll be sure to update if I was misunderstood on that point.
As for Limelight, we'll have a piece next week with the its perspective on the market and plans for dealing with the issues mentioned above.
Thanks for reading and commenting!
Pete
I believe Dan touched on this in several of his posts but how about innovation? By deploying adaptive streaming (Adobe’s dynamic streaming, Move’s adaptive streaming and Microsoft’s SmoothStreaming) they will enable content owners to deliver consistent experience that adapts from dialup to HD quality depending on viewer’s Internet connection and machine capabilities. Or how about providing E2E (end-to-end) media workflow that enables content owners not only to deliver media, but to transode it if necessary, manage their assets including metadata, monetize on it and publish it to various formats and platforms? Delivering video to large audiences consistently can also get very expensive (e.g., recent YouTube’s type of live event conducted on regular basis). Needless to say there is a tremendous amount of work ahead of all of them. Regardless of revenue numbers listed above, this industry is still in early stages and has long ways to go.
I have looked into the Edgecast's owners history, James Segil, Phil Goldsmith, and Alex Kazerani. The other owners on the list on their webpage don't have anything except for Lior Elizary. Well, the main owners always sell their companies after 3 or more years in business. They make their millions and leave. They are planning to do the same with Edgecast. If you look at the history of the companies they've sold, there is a major history of unhappy customers and a terrible service. You are right, Edgecast customers should leave.


SHARE
WITH:
Comments (4) | Post a comment